Review Procedure

The review procedure for Epidemiology – Open Journal is designed to ensure the publication of high-quality, impactful, and scientifically robust articles. Upon submission, each manuscript undergoes an initial assessment by the editorial team to verify that it aligns with the journal's scope and meets its basic formatting and ethical requirements. Once approved for further evaluation, the manuscript is assigned to an editor with expertise in the relevant field. The editor selects appropriate peer reviewers who possess significant expertise in epidemiology or related disciplines.

The peer review process is typically double-blinded to maintain impartiality, ensuring that neither the authors nor the reviewers are aware of each other's identities. Reviewers are tasked with assessing the manuscript for scientific rigor, originality, clarity, methodology, and relevance to the field. They provide detailed feedback and recommendations, which may include acceptance, minor or major revisions, or rejection. The editorial team consolidates these reviews and communicates the decision to the authors, along with any required revisions or suggestions.

Authors are expected to address reviewers’ comments comprehensively and submit a revised version of the manuscript. The revised submission may undergo further rounds of review, particularly if significant revisions were requested. Once the manuscript meets the required standards, it is approved for publication. The journal upholds strict ethical guidelines throughout the review process, ensuring transparency, confidentiality, and the avoidance of conflicts of interest. This thorough and systematic review procedure upholds the credibility and scientific integrity of Epidemiology – Open Journal.