Reviewer Policies
1. Reviewers Guidelines
The Reviewers Guidelines outline the expectations and responsibilities of reviewers when evaluating manuscripts submitted to Obesity Research – Open Journal. Reviewers are expected to assess manuscripts based on scientific validity, originality, clarity, and relevance to the field of obesity research. They must provide constructive feedback to authors, helping to improve the quality of the manuscript. Reviewers should also evaluate the ethical aspects of the research, including participant consent and the integrity of data presentation. By adhering to these guidelines, reviewers contribute to ensuring that only high-quality, ethically sound research is published.
2. Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (specific to reviewers)
The Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures policy for reviewers ensures transparency and objectivity in the review process. Reviewers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest, including personal, financial, or professional relationships that could influence their impartiality. This policy prevents biases in the review process and ensures that all decisions regarding manuscript evaluation are made based on scientific merit, not personal or financial gain. If a reviewer has a conflict of interest with a manuscript they are reviewing, they are expected to recuse themselves from the evaluation process to maintain the integrity of the journal.
