Editorial Policies

  1. Creative Commons License
  2. Peer Review Process
  3. Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
  4. Publisher Policies
  5. Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (specific to editors)
  6. COPE Recommendation for Plagiarism
  7. Advertisement Policies
  8. Editorial Policies
  9. Editorial Process
  10. COPE Recommendation for Conflict of Interest (specific to editors)

1. Creative Commons License

The Pediatrics and Neonatal Nursing journal embraces open access publishing and applies a Creative Commons (CC) license to all its published articles. The most commonly adopted CC license is the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. This license allows others to freely distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the published work, even for commercial purposes, as long as the original authors are properly credited. This policy ensures that the work is freely accessible to a wider audience, increasing the visibility of the research and encouraging further academic collaboration.

By applying a Creative Commons license, the journal supports the global movement towards open access, promoting the dissemination of pediatric and neonatal nursing knowledge. Authors retain copyright of their work, which empowers them to reuse, share, and distribute the content under the terms of the selected CC license. This licensing policy also aligns with the journal's commitment to fostering knowledge exchange and ensuring that research is available without the barriers of subscription fees or paywalls.


2. Peer Review Process

The Pediatrics and Neonatal Nursing journal employs a double-blind peer review process to ensure the highest standards of scientific integrity and objectivity in evaluating submitted manuscripts. This process involves sending the manuscript to at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field of pediatric and neonatal nursing. Both the identities of the authors and reviewers are kept confidential throughout the review process to eliminate bias.

The reviewers assess the manuscript for its originality, scientific rigor, relevance to the field, methodological quality, and overall impact on clinical practice. They provide feedback and recommendations on whether the manuscript should be accepted, revised, or rejected. This ensures that the journal publishes only well-researched, credible, and high-quality articles.

The peer review process is central to maintaining the journal’s scientific credibility, and all decisions are made based on objective analysis. Additionally, this process helps authors improve their manuscripts by offering constructive criticism, ensuring that the published research is of the highest possible standard.


3. Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

The Pediatrics and Neonatal Nursing journal follows stringent publication ethics and adheres to internationally recognized guidelines for publication integrity. The journal upholds the principles outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to ensuring that all content published is original, accurate, and ethically sound. This includes verifying that all studies have received appropriate ethical approval, that patient consent is obtained when necessary, and that authorship is accurately assigned.

In cases of misconduct, such as plagiarism, falsification of data, or duplicate publication, the journal will follow a clear procedure to investigate and address such issues, including possible retraction of articles or other corrective actions. The editorial board will work closely with COPE to ensure that all parties involved—authors, reviewers, and editors—adhere to ethical publishing practices. This policy is essential for maintaining the trust of readers, authors, and contributors, and ensuring the credibility of the journal.


4. Publisher Policies

The Pediatrics and Neonatal Nursing journal, published by a respected academic publisher, adheres to industry best practices and ethical guidelines in all aspects of its operation. The publisher is committed to ensuring high-quality content, timely publication, and the ethical treatment of all stakeholders in the publication process, including authors, reviewers, and readers.

The publisher follows transparent editorial and production processes, with clear policies in place for manuscript submission, peer review, and publication. Additionally, the publisher is dedicated to open access principles, ensuring that all articles are freely accessible to readers worldwide. The publisher also complies with relevant laws and regulations, such as copyright and data protection laws, ensuring that authors' intellectual property rights are respected, and that personal data is handled with the utmost care and confidentiality.


5. Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (Specific to Editors)

The Pediatrics and Neonatal Nursing journal requires its editors to declare any potential conflicts of interest that may influence their impartiality and objectivity when making editorial decisions. This disclosure includes any financial, professional, or personal relationships with authors, institutions, or companies related to the manuscript under review. Editors must recuse themselves from handling manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest, ensuring that the journal's editorial decisions are made without bias.

Editors are also required to disclose any financial relationships, such as funding, sponsorships, or stock holdings, that might be perceived as conflicting with their role in managing the editorial process. This commitment to transparency helps maintain the integrity of the journal and ensures that all editorial decisions are based solely on the quality and scientific merit of the manuscript.


6. COPE Recommendation for Plagiarism

The Pediatrics and Neonatal Nursing journal adheres to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines concerning plagiarism. The journal takes allegations of plagiarism very seriously and employs plagiarism detection tools to screen submitted manuscripts for similarities to previously published works. If plagiarism is detected, the manuscript is subject to rejection, and the authors may face sanctions, such as a ban on future submissions to the journal.

In cases of suspected plagiarism, the journal follows a rigorous investigation process, in line with COPE’s recommendations, to determine the extent of the misconduct and take appropriate action. Authors are encouraged to ensure the originality of their work and to properly attribute any sources used. This policy ensures that the journal maintains its reputation for publishing only original and high-quality research.


7. Advertisement Policies

The Pediatrics and Neonatal Nursing journal maintains a strict advertisement policy to preserve the integrity of the publication and avoid any potential conflicts of interest. Advertisements related to pediatric or neonatal nursing products, pharmaceuticals, or services may be accepted; however, they are clearly distinguished from editorial content. The journal ensures that advertisements do not influence the editorial decision-making process or compromise the scientific content of the articles.

All advertisements must comply with relevant regulations, including ethical standards for advertising in medical journals. The journal also reserves the right to refuse advertisements that could mislead readers or conflict with the journal’s ethical guidelines, ensuring that all content—both editorial and commercial—is transparent and aligned with the interests of readers and the scientific community.


8. Editorial Policies

The Pediatrics and Neonatal Nursing journal’s editorial policies are designed to maintain the highest standards of academic publishing. These policies cover the manuscript submission process, peer review procedures, and ethical guidelines for authors, reviewers, and editors. The editorial board is responsible for overseeing the scientific quality and relevance of the content published, and for ensuring that manuscripts are processed fairly and efficiently.

The editorial policies are aligned with best practices in academic publishing, as outlined by COPE, and ensure that the journal’s content is scientifically rigorous, ethically sound, and relevant to the field of pediatric and neonatal nursing. The policies also emphasize transparency, ensuring that all decisions, including rejections, revisions, and acceptances, are based on objective criteria.


9. Editorial Process

The editorial process of the Pediatrics and Neonatal Nursing journal is structured to ensure that manuscripts undergo thorough and objective evaluation. Upon submission, manuscripts are first reviewed by the editorial team for compliance with the journal’s scope and formatting guidelines. Accepted manuscripts are then sent to peer reviewers for in-depth evaluation.

Once reviews are received, the editorial team makes a decision based on the reviewers’ feedback. Authors are notified of the decision and may be asked to revise their manuscripts before final acceptance. The process is designed to ensure that only high-quality research is published in the journal, contributing to the advancement of knowledge in the fields of pediatrics and neonatal nursing.


10. COPE Recommendation for Conflict of Interest (Specific to Editors)

The Pediatrics and Neonatal Nursing journal follows the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines for managing conflicts of interest for editors. Editors are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest when handling manuscripts, including financial, professional, or personal relationships with authors, institutions, or funding bodies. This ensures that editorial decisions are made impartially and without bias.

When a conflict of interest is identified, the editor must recuse themselves from the decision-making process for that particular manuscript. The editorial board also ensures that the overall editorial process remains transparent and that the integrity of the review and publication process is not compromised. By adhering to COPE's conflict of interest guidelines, the journal maintains trust with authors, reviewers, and readers, ensuring the credibility of the research it publishes